Category Archives: Uncategorized

Domaine Huet Le Mont Sec Vouvray 2005

OK, Lady A, consider yourself dumped. I spent a couple of days pondering it, the main question being: sure, it was good, but did I like it? Really, I knew the answer the first moment I tasted it. I’m glad I did (taste it, I mean), but really, I wouldn’t want to again.

The final nail in Lady A’s coffin came last night, when I uncorked this, a wine that strives not simply for complexity, as if for its own sake, but for beauty. Without wishing to give myself away as some kind of vinous jonny-come-lately, I’ve not had a huge number of chenin blancs in my time. Indeed until this summer I had no idea of the heights that it can reach at such decent prices. But first the FMC, and now this … it’s a game-changer, really. The FMC cost £13.49 in the Waitrose sale, this £13.86, 37 pence between them. These are two prize fighters competing in the same division, punch for delicious, delicate punch: new world (that) v old (this); 15-year-old vines (this) v 35-year-old (that); honey and dried apricot (that) v searingly, tingly bright acidity (this, with 6.10g/l residual sugar v the FMC’s 12.8). Don’t ask me to judge between them, it’s like comparing The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy with The Godfather Part II. They’re just amazing, both of them. But this one’s biodynamic, as well – she’s got the ethics as well as the looks. She’s a stunnah, true enough.

More like this, please. Much more.

Cellar Fella goes out: Bob Bob Ricard

The guys behind Bob Bob Ricard, at least one of whom is called Bob (although I’ve just looked him up and he’s actually called Leonid, and I don’t know where that leaves me), they know a thing or two about branding. Everything, near enough, in this restaurant is branded, down to the butter. Plates? Branded. Windows? Branded. The little metal bins in the toilet that you throw your handtowel into? Branded. Still, it looks good, in a way-over-the-top way, just about having enough humour to avoid falling into crass tastelessness. It all works, the wallpaper, the pink-jacketed waiters, the lot. Somehow.

So inviting over a load of food and drink bloggers and giving them the best you’ve got, that makes a lot of sense, branding-wise. Sure, they made us pay for it. But not that much: we paid £40 plus service for a four-course meal with drinks. Off the menu, you’d have spent that on the drinks alone – and that’s before they got going with the truffles. And they did get going with the truffles. Still, there’s nothing wrong with hospitality. They got decent if mixed reviews when they opened a couple of years back, but Bob/Leonid says they only got their menu right 18 months later. So, they’ll be needing some new reviews then. Perhaps that’s what we’re there for. Maybe they’re just good guys who enjoy hanging out with people who like food and drink a little more than is healthy.

I’m not complaining either way. I had a good night. They gave me vodka and truffles. The food was pretty good. The veal holstein, that’s a good main course. Mashed potato heavy with truffles, schnitzel balanced on the top, fried quail’s egg balanced on the top of that, little anchovy fillets balanced on top of that. Not as tall as it sounds. Excellent, savoury “secret” sauce hidden under the schnitzel. The russian salad with black truffles, that was a surprisingly decent use of quite a lot of truffle.

It was all good up to the dessert. A perfect ball of gilded chocolate which melts away upon application of hot chocolate sauce to reveal the chocolate mousse within, studded with brownie chunks and passionfruit and orange jelly. Looked great. 9/10 for looks. Brilliant theatre. 9/10 for theatre. Tasted like an absolute sugar overload. Way too much warm chocolateyness. Reduce it in size by 95% and serve it as the most over-the-top petit four in all of history, a single bite of chocolatey theatricality, and you’re on to a winner. Get some ice cream involved, and something that crunches. This? Too much. They call it Chocolate Glory, but they’ve gone to town too much on the former to achieve the latter.

Overall? Go. It’s not cheap, but it is fun, the ambience making up for any lack of value in the food. They’re quite proud of the wine list, and its pricing – going so far as to name and shame the rival restaurants who stock the same wines at much greater cost. I didn’t really investigate, the drinks flowing as part of our set meal. The booths make it a great date venue, or a good place to eat alone. Don’t order the Chocolate Glory. With any luck, someone else will while you’re there. It’s worth looking at. It’s not worth eating.

Domaine A Lady A Fumé Blanc 2005

“Oh my god!” said Mrs Cellar Fella when she took a sniff of this. After a quick sip, she proclaimed that it tasted of cheese. This is not her standard reaction to sauvignon blanc. But then, this is not a standard wine. Some wines, lots of ’em, are hard to find information about. Not this one. It’s all over the internet like teenage tourists on a Robert Pattinson waxwork.

It’s a new world sauvignon blanc unlike any other I’ve ever had, from a one-acre plot of vines in Tasmania, that gets plenty of lees contact during fermentation and then spends a year in French oak. You basically can’t buy a new world sauvignon that was harvested earlier than 2008. This one is five years old, and the Swiss bloke who made it says it could have another five and be all the better for it.

It doesn’t taste of cheese. But it doesn’t taste like sauvignon blanc. It doesn’t taste very oaky, but it is intensely buttery and creamy and, er, vanilla-ey. It smells like rotting apple peelings. You’re not sure if it’s pleasant or not, but it’s certainly redolent of something pleasant.

The flavour is complex and long and certainly good. It is a wine to savour and ponder. It is not a summer barbecue favourite. It isn’t an easy quaffer. I’m not really used to drinking white wines this complex. I’m enjoying it, but I’m confused by it.

Selling out

While I’m on the subject of wine sales, it strikes me that they remain surprisingly contentious. The very idea makes some people – really rather a lot of people, it seems – shudder with horror, while all they make me is a) merry, and b) poorer.

Obviously, there are wine “bargains” that are still rip-offs, consisting of bottles that have been sold for a while at about double their value in order to later be flogged with a half-price sticker, and often produced by multi-national wine-spewing conglomerates of yuck. Then there’s the 25% off everything sale, which every supermarket seems to wheel out from time to time. While these give me nothing but the impression that their normal prices must be a bit too high, these are the normal prices I usually have to pay – which makes three-quarters of the normal price quite an attractive prospect.

While buying wine from supermarkets doesn’t really suit my research-everything-ridiculously tendencies, Waitrose’s biannual discounting frenzy is a very major exception. The ability to mix your own case of some genuinely decent stuff at genuinely decent prices from your very own sofa is too much for me to withstand; within 15 minutes of me hearing about their last offer, a couple of weeks ago, and knowing that my children would wake up from their lunchtime naps at any moment, I had ordered two cases.

Then there is the genuine wine sale, like the one I found at Les Caves de Pyrene last weekend, where a retailer is trying to get rid of some old stock that’s clogging up their warehouse. The job that sales always used to do, before they became regular festivals of comsumption. Quite a lot of the wine I bought had something clearly wrong with it – it was a few years old but not intended for keeping, or the label was damaged, or it was from Morocco. I’m happy to have bought something for less than the going rate, they’re happy to have got rid of the stuff in the first place, everyone’s happy.

Except those who consider wine to rightfully be above this sort of thing, the shallow pursuit of a bargain. That the obsession with discounting makes life difficult for retailers and impossible for producers. That it stops people from buying any wine that isn’t reduced. That even wine that isn’t discounted is nevertheless cheapened.

I like my sales. They suit me well. But I can see where they’re coming from, to be honest.

(incidentally, last night I cracked open the first of this year’s Les Caves bottles, an Afros Vinho Verde Tinto Espumante 2006 – fizzy, red vinho verde. Brilliantly vivid, a lot of fun. The latest vintage (2008) is £17.99 online (a fair bit more than it’s worth, I think), but at exactly half that in the sale, a bargain!)

Driving force

The main thing I remember about last year’s summer sale at Les Caves de Pyrene, the Guildford-based wine importer (other than the quality of wine I ended up with, which was extremely impressive) is the disastrous traffic Gilad and I encountered on our way home. The main thing I’ll remember about this year’s – the quality of wine being as yet unproven – is the disastrous traffic I encountered on the way there. It was hideous. The North Circular was a car park, the final mile on the approach to the Chiswick Roundabout taking me about an hour. When the cars already on the M25 appeared similarly stationary I asked my satnav to find another route; its selection was astonishingly circuitous, and included not one but two roads that were closed for roadworks.

When I finally did arrive, I was surprised that the small shop wasn’t a bit more crowded – particularly since the sale had been compressed from two days to one. “You should have been here when we opened,” one member of staff said when I made that observation out loud. The early birds clearly caught the vinous worm – there seemed slightly less choice there today, compared to last year, and none of the big successes of a year ago were in evidence. But I wasn’t going all that way for nothing, and quickly compiled three cases all the same.

Most of the people who were there when I arrived at about midday were clustered around the tasting table, so I scurried around the rest of the room selecting bottles more or less at random. I did try a few, when a place at the top table appeared, but given last year’s experience I was happy enough to trust their selective abilities. For the record, as I’ll certainly want this list to refer to in the future and will almost certainly lose my one hard copy within 24 hours, this is what I ended up with. You will notice one bottle that stands out, mainly for being three times more expensive than anything else – a 1989 Mas de Daumas Gassac, a famous wine from the Languedoc that requires a great deal of ageing. This should be ready, and though at £45 it is comfortably the most expensive bottle of wine I have ever bought it is a) only £15 more than the latest vintage; and b) exactly half the lowest price I can find for it on wine-searcher.com. The label was almost totally ruined, (partly) explaining the price. Anyway, here’s that list, all prices per bottle:

Les Cretes torrette 2003 (their fumin was the biggest hit of last year’s haul) x 2 (£5)

Di Barro fumin 2004 x 2 (£10)

Salentein Primus pinot noir 2004 x2 (£10)

Zouina Epicuria Syrah 2005 x4 (£11)

Palari Rosso del Sporano 2005 x2 (£12)

Vaubois pinot noir 2005 x2 (£4)

Afros Espumante Vinhao Vinho Verde tinto 2006 x2 (£8.50)

Mirausse Le Grand Penchant Azerolle 2006 x1 (£6)

Tollo Madregale Rosso 2007 x1 (£3)

Dom Foulards VDT Soif du Mal Rouge 2007 x2 (£8)

Dom Foulards VDT Soif du Mal Rouge 2008 x2 (£8.50)

Dom Foulards VDT Vilains rouge 2007 x2 (£8)

Hatzidakis Santorini Cuvee 17 2007 x4 (£6; slightly damaged labels)

Terras Gauda O Rosal 2008 x1 (£10)

Daumas Gassac rouge 1989 x1 (£45.50; horrifically damaged labels)

Fazio Brusio Blanco Sicilia IGT 2007 x2 (£4.50)

Fondreche Rouge Cuvee Fayard 2007 x2 (£6)

Schuster Twin Vineyards pinot noir 2008 x2 (£8)

The FMC Chenin Blanc 2008

I’ve had a bad wine year, I think. If I try to think of my wine of the year so far, and we’re near as dammit halfway through it so I should have had some good ones by now, there’s just nothing that stands out. Lots of decent stuff, sure. Plenty of mild, gentle pleasure. But no stars.

This is stellar stuff. It’s not just liquid inside this bottle, it’s hope, it’s fun, it’s life. It’s the reason I don’t just buy wine and drink it, but read about it, obsess about it, invest my money and my mind in it. It’s the reason why I shouldn’t just keep buying that £6 wine that I really like but keep looking, keep pushing my boundaries and my budget.

It’s a loveable wine. Voluptuous. We first tried it last year, at a charity dinner at a South African restaurant in town called High Timber. It was good. So I bought a bottle in the Waitrose 25% off everything sale (where it’s £17.09 currently, with no discount), and since then it’s been sat in my wine rack, waiting for a special occasion. Today – eating a salad in the garden with my wife and some sunshine – was special enough.

It tastes of so much. It sits in your mouth, brassy and bold, caressing it from the inside, daring you to swallow. It’s honeydew and nectarine and all things nice. I couldn’t afford to only drink £17 wines, but £17 isn’t really so much money for something that’s so much better than everything that costs less, really. Delicious. Brilliant.

I may have been a little over-effusive in this post. Sorry.

Bibendum’s World Cup of Wine semi-finals

It’s just days now until Bibendum’s World Cup final and I still haven’t written up the semi-final. There are two reasons for this: 1) I took diligent notes throughout the evening, stuck them in my back pocket and then they fell out. Well, I’m assuming they fell out. There’s a chance that a pickpocket stole them, but if that’s the case they’re a truly awful pickpocket, because they didn’t bother with my iPod. Anyway, by the time I got home they weren’t there. b) I was quite embarrassed about that. c) What’s worse, I forgot to bring my camera. d) Not that it matters, because I did bring my camera to the quarter-finals but the results were so uniformly abysmal I couldn’t use any of them.

Fortunately, I have a very good memory, and someone else’s extremely detailed report (she didn’t lose her notes), to borrow from.

France v Italy The real World Cup final four years ago, it took a really tough draw to stop the two old world titans from meeting at that stage again here. The wines, and the choice of wines, was much, much better than at the quarter-finals, where there were too many mismatches, really. First, a chablis was marginally outscored by a surprisingly excellent soave. Then a viognier took on an Alto Adige Gewurztraminer, probably also a narrow win for Italy, despite my preference for viognier as a rule. Then to the reds, where the fixture between the Col di Sasso Banfi cab sauv/sangiovese 2007 and the Terres de Truffes AOC Ventoux 2007 brought the first real arguments. My group liked both, but I loved the TdT, a wine to spend a very happy evening with and excellent value at £8.50; the other group thought the Banfi was the wine of the night. It was too taught for me, all precision and not enough pleasure. No matter, a not great Bordeaux was outgunned by a Valpolicella Ripasso in the final match-up and Italy had a convincing victory.

Australia v South Africa Australia had a bad start, their Deakin Estate Chardonay/Pinot Grigio 2009 getting royally thumped by a Graham Beck Chenin Blanc, and they never recovered. Chardonnays were about equal, South Africa edged it on the pinot noirs and then in the final fixture, a d’Arenberg Stump Jump that I didn’t really warm to was well outmanoevred by a shiraz/viognier (not long ago you didn’t see viognier at all; now it’s just everywhere). And South Africa eased into the final, where surely they have no chance against France.

Surely?

The name’s bond. In bond

I keep getting emails about 2009 Bordeaux, the latest vintage of the century. They’re alluring, and I must admit I have been allured once or twice in the past. Within months of my first joining the Wine Society they started to sell the 2005 vintage – the last vintage of the century – and I dipped my toe in the pond with a case of the cheapest thing they mustered some enthusiasm for, Chateau Roland La Garde. This has come into its drinking window, and it’s, well, it’s good. But I haven’t found it enormously exciting. When push comes to shove, it’s a decent bottom-end claret.

At the top end, investors buy first growths to trade and can make hundreds or thousands of pounds in profit from buying en primeur and trading at a later date. At the lower end, I don’t really see why the en primeur market exists. It seems to help everyone except the consumer, who shells out a not particularly bargainous price to secure wine years before they’ll be able to drink it and then gets to pay some more for its storage. Why don’t I keep my cash in my pocket, avoid the risk of getting a dozen bottles of something I’m not in love with and get some 2009 clarets in a few years time when they’re ready for drinking?

Tonight, I’ve been enjoying a Craggy Range Te Kahu, also from 2005 and also fashioned from Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot. There’s no great qualitative difference between this and the CRLG, but one was all sold up years ago, and the other is still available from M&S for a tenner. I think, in short, that there are enough actual ready-to-take-home wines in the shops to keep me happy, without saddling myself with some-time-in-the-future wine. That’s something for my future, I think.

I might be missing out on a bargain (Chateau Couhins Lurton looks enticing, I must admit), but I think it’s a risk I’m ready to take, for now at least.

Viajante

Nuno Mendes’s new restaurant has got the blogosphere humming. I’m not sure what gives the Portuguese chef this star quality, because he certainly doesn’t have it in person, where he come across as unassuming to the point of shyness. He once worked at El Bulli, but then as I understand it so have, literally, hundreds of others. Perhaps his reputation in the capital was created by The Loft, his supperclub project which invited Londoners to hand over £100, really quite a lot for one of these things, to eat at his home. But how many people really ate there, or even heard of it?

Anyway, he now has a proper restaurant all of his own. And it’s in Bethnal Green. It’s no surprise in this city to see a small army of chefs constructing cutting-edge dishes with tweezers and chemistry sets, but you probably wouldn’t expect to find them within spitting distance of  York Hall. But, lured by the thrill of the new, by eating somewhere even before I’d seen it reviewed, I trotted off for lunch at the end of last week.

At 12.30 it was not busy. So not busy, in fact, that we were the only people there. By the time we left a couple of other tables were full. We had absolutely no idea what to expect, the website not giving much of a clue about the menu. As it turned out, the menu didn’t give much of a clue about the menu. It was tiny. It said: six courses; nine courses; 12 courses. It didn’t tell you what the courses were. There was also, we were told, a three-course lunch menu, which the menu itself was too minimalist to mention. If it was all right with us, we should just choose the number of courses we wanted and the chef would make us whatever he wanted.

I was, to be honest, happy to play his game. At l’Enclume, for example, you get menus that are almost totally useless. “Grown-up Yolk from the Golden Egg,” they’ll trumpet, as if that would give you the slightest clue as to what you might get. Best just do away with them altogether. Anyway, three courses, £25; matching drinks, £15.

With a small glass of champagne, the food started to come. A crunchy toasty stick with olivey stuff and peppery stuff. Nice enough. A “thai explosion” – crunchy biscuity stuff, this time, with spiced chicken and – we were told to just chuck it in our mouths rather than take any dainty bites, so I can’t be sure – what felt rather a lot like half a poached quail’s egg, something I’m pretty sure can’t exist. Nice. Then an aubergine and soya milk layered jelly thing, almost certainly the most offensive jelly thing that’s ever wobbled in my direction, an over-chilled festival of unpleasant flavours and texture, served with a fine aubergine baclawa. Bread, served with whipped beurre noisette sprinkled with tiny flecks of crisped chicken skin and pancetta and a black potato powder, was the first big hit. Moist, flavoursome bread presented with something that’s got to be a thousand times better than bog-standard butter, which is just so much churned milk.

We hadn’t yet had our first course: beetroot textures, apple puree, sour cream and crab. I like beetroot a lot, but there wasn’t much to excite here. A tiny sprinkling of chopped toasted hazelnuts added some welcome crunch, but this was a lot of effort for minimal impact. It was served with a dark, sensual beer (name unknown, I’m afraid), which was significantly more popular than the food. Then two cuts of slow-cooked pork with savoy cabbage, grated egg and fried capers. Lovely, soft meat with the capers providing salty explosions of saltiness. Very good. Then as a pre-desert, a lemon and thai basil sorbet with lemon sherbet, which was absolutely sensational, an overdose of zing. Finally, a mini chocolate fondant with blackcurrant sauce, chocolate praline, hazelnut ice cream and praline snow. A lot of fuss, to be sure, but delicious, intelligent, top-notch cooking. Filter coffee (all they had, as they were still waiting for the coffee machine) was exceptional and came with a petit four of dark chocolate filled with cep-infused white chocolate ganache. As weird as it sounds, but when your mouth got used to the bizarreness of it all, it told you it was very happy.

Service was extremely friendly, with Mendes himself bringing us several dishes and seemingly interested in our opinions. The food was, if truth be told, hit and miss, but its hits were emphatic and the misses relatively minor. But a 70% success rate is fine in a £25 lunch deal; if I’m handing over £100 for 12 courses I might feel less charitable.

In Côt We Trust 2007

Several weeks ago I was walking past a local wine merchant, Wine of Course. It’s always seemed a decent place, and the buggy I was pushing contained a totally unconscious infant, so I went in, told the bloke there that he should give me a bottle of wine which would make me want to go back, bought it and left again. It was a fairly simple transaction, really.

And this was it. I was warned that it might stink a little bit of poo, a suggestion I accepted with rather more grace than many might, and that it would therefore benefit from a bit of decanting, which is exactly what it got. I also, while at the shop, ignored the comedy pun title, which would ordinarily have scared me off right away.

So côt = malbec, and I know malbec. It’s that big, brassy, bad-ass inky mother from Argentina. But this, and that, are not really the same. They’re only vaguely similar. “A veritable wilderness of yeasty madness,” says Les Caves de Pyrene, who import it. “This is Malbec sauvage, sans filtration and sans sulphur.” I think they’re overdoing it slightly. Sure, there’s a farmyard pong, but the wine itself, once you’ve fought your way to it, is really quite restrained. Much less full-bodied than the malbec I know. Really very smooth. Flavourful, but restrained at the same time. It’s a prince dressed as a pauper, Sir Ian McKellen playing Wurzel Gummidge.

A good wine, interesting. I paid, I think, £17 for it, which I think is probably a little bit more than I would expect, but then it’s from a small local merchant, deliberately selling the kind of stuff that Tesco’s don’t. Even if it does smell like manure.